Comment on Terjesen and Horn: ‘Prognostic value of severity of dislocation in late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip’
Residual dysplasia was measured in Group 1, where the authors have defined it as the signifier for the need for additional surgery during childhood and adolescence, or centre-edge angle < 20° degrees at skeletal maturity, but this has been not elaborated upon. [...]the borderline cases may be sub...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of children's orthopaedics Vol. 14; no. 6; pp. 589 - 590 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London, England
SAGE Publications
01.12.2020
Sage Publications Ltd The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Residual dysplasia was measured in Group 1, where the authors have defined it as the signifier for the need for additional surgery during childhood and adolescence, or centre-edge angle < 20° degrees at skeletal maturity, but this has been not elaborated upon. [...]the borderline cases may be subject to classification error as either Grade II or III. According to this study, the LMH classification predicted 50% of Grade III DDH cases from Group 1 (treated by traction and closed reduction only) needed total hip arthroplasty. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1863-2521 1863-2548 |
DOI: | 10.1302/1863-2548.14.200192 |