Accuracy of digitally coded healing abutments: A systematic review

• Published in: The Saudi dental journal Vol. 35; no. 8; pp. 891 - 903
• Main Authors: Talesara, Vaibhav, Bennani, Vincent, Aarts, John, Ratnayake, Jithendra, Khurshid, Zohaib, Brunton, Paul
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Saudi Arabia Elsevier 01.12.2023
• Subjects: Dental implants; Digital impression; Digitally coded healing abutments; Healing abutment; Review; Healing abutment; Digital impression; Dental implants; Digitally coded healing abutments
• ISSN: 1013-9052; 1658-3558
• DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.08.006

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the in vitro accuracy of dental implant impressions taken using digitally coded healing abutments (CHAs) compared with impressions taken with conventional techniques (CI) and/or within the CHA group at varying degrees of angulations for multiple implant units. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic electronic search in the MedLine, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Some of the employed key terms, combined with the help of Boolean operators, were: "digitally coded healing abutments", "encode healing abutment", "dental implants", "impression accuracy", "digital impression", and "conventional impression". Publication dates ranged from January 2010 to November 2022. A total of 7 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 6 studies compared the accuracy of CHA with conventional pick-up impression techniques, and one study only used CHAs at different angulations and heights to compare accuracy within the group. The results were divided into Group A (elastomeric impression of CHA) and Group B (CHA + Intraoral scanner). According to the results of this systematic review, elastomeric impression of CHA performed poorly when compared to CI for multiple implants, although an intraoral scan of CHA appears to be more accurate. Within the CHA group, the angulation and visible height of CHA play a significant role in impression accuracy. However, more studies are needed before CHA can be recommended for all non-parallel multiple implant-supported restorations.