Comparison between loop-tip guidewire-assisted and conventional endoscopic cannulation in high risk patients
Background: The guidewire biliary cannulation (GWC) technique may increase the cannulation rate and decrease the risk for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. The aim of our multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial was to determine if the use of an atra...
Saved in:
Published in | Endoscopy International Open Vol. 3; no. 5; pp. E464 - E470 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Stuttgart · New York
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
01.10.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background:
The guidewire biliary cannulation (GWC) technique may increase the cannulation rate and decrease the risk for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. The aim of our multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial was to determine if the use of an atraumatic loop-tip guidewire reduces the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) compared with the standard contrast-assisted cannulation (CC) technique.
Methods:
From June 2012 to December 2013, a total of 320 patients who had a naïve papilla and were referred for ERCP were randomly assigned to the GWC group (n = 160) or the CC group (n = 160). GWC or CC was randomly used. In cases of failed cannulation in both arms after crossover, biliary access was attempted with alternative techniques (e. g., dual-wire technique, pancreatic duct stenting, precut).
Results:
The biliary cannulation rates were 81 % in the GWC group and 73 % in the CC group (
P
= n. s.). Following crossover, cannulation was successful in 8 % and 11 % of patients in the GWC and CC groups, respectively. With use of an alternative technique, the cannulation rates were 98 % in the GWC group and 96 % in the CC group, respectively. The rates of PEP were 5 % in the GWC group and 12 % in the CC group (
P
= 0.027). The post-interventional complication rates did not differ between the two groups.
Conclusion:
GWC with the new wire guide is associated with a lower rate of PEP in comparison with the CC technique.
Clinical trial reference number: NCT01771419 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2364-3722 2196-9736 |
DOI: | 10.1055/s-0034-1392879 |