Volume Conduction Influences Scalp-Based Connectivity Estimates
[...]in general direct application of connectivity measures to scalp EEG signals produces less than accurate results and also does not allow their clear interpretation in terms of underlying source dynamics. [...]the observed changes in the DTF can be explained by the fact that adding a sinusoid to...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in computational neuroscience Vol. 10; p. 121 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Research Foundation
22.11.2016
Frontiers Media S.A |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | [...]in general direct application of connectivity measures to scalp EEG signals produces less than accurate results and also does not allow their clear interpretation in terms of underlying source dynamics. [...]the observed changes in the DTF can be explained by the fact that adding a sinusoid to all EEG channels with equal strength does not reflect volume conduction of a realistic brain source. Simulation Although the analytic derivation can be extended to more than two sources, computing and notating the individual elements of the mixed transfer matrix becomes quite unwieldy. [...]we simulated three cortical sources and used a realistic forward model of volume conduction from brain to scalp to numerically estimate their summed activity at three scalp EEG channels. [...]while DTF and other connectivity estimators can be applied to either scalp channels or to (estimated) source signals, results are highly likely to be more accurate when the analysis is based on source activities. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by: Petr Lansky, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic Reviewed by: Michael X. Cohen, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands; Tolga Esat Özkurt, Middle East Technical University, Turkey |
ISSN: | 1662-5188 1662-5188 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fncom.2016.00121 |