Establishing a Gross Primary Productivity Model by SIF and PRI on the Rice Canopy

Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has shown remarkable results in estimating vegetation carbon cycles, and combining it with the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) has great potential for estimating gross primary productivity (GPP). However, few studies have used SIF combined with PRI...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPlant phenomics Vol. 6; p. 0144
Main Authors Zhang, Zhanhao, Guo, Jianmao, Han, Shihui, Jin, Shuyuan, Zhang, Lei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States AAAS 01.01.2024
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has shown remarkable results in estimating vegetation carbon cycles, and combining it with the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) has great potential for estimating gross primary productivity (GPP). However, few studies have used SIF combined with PRI to estimate crop canopy GPP. Large temporal and spatial variability between SIF, PRI, and GPP has also been found in remote sensing observations, and the observed PRI and SIF are influenced by the ratio of different observed information (e.g., background, direct sunlit, and shaded leaves) and the physiological state of the vegetation. In this study, the PRI and SIF from a multi-angle spectrometer and the GPP from an eddy covariance system were used to assess the ability of the PRI to enhance the SIF-GPP estimation model. A semi-empirical kernel-driven Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) model was used to describe the hotspot PRI/SIF (PRI /SIF ), and a modified two-leaf model was used to calculate the total canopy PRI/SIF (PRI /SIF ). We compared the accuracies of PRI /SIF and PRI /SIF in estimating GPP. The results indicated that the PRI +SIF -GPP model performed the best, with a correlation coefficient ( ) of the validation dataset of 0.88, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 3.74, and relative prediction deviation (RPD) of 2.71. The leaf area index (LAI) had a linear effect on the PRI/SIF estimation of GPP, but the temperature and vapor pressure differences had nonlinear effects. Compared with hotspot PRI /SIF , PRI /SIF exhibited better consistency with GPP across different time series. Our research demonstrates that PRI is effective in enhancing SIF and PRI for estimating GPP on the rice canopy and also suggests that the two-leaf model would contribute to the vegetation index tracking the real-time crop productivity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2643-6515
2643-6515
DOI:10.34133/plantphenomics.0144