Safety and efficacy of reoperative carotid endarterectomy: A 14-year experience

Reoperative carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an accepted treatment for recurrent carotid stenosis. With reports of a higher operative morbidity than primary CEA and the advent of carotid stenting, catheter-based therapy has been advocated as the primary treatment for this reportedly “high-risk” subgr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of vascular surgery Vol. 41; no. 6; pp. 942 - 949
Main Authors Stoner, Michael C., Cambria, Richard P., Brewster, David C., Juhola, Kendra L., Watkins, Michael T., Kwolek, Christopher J., Hua, Hong T., LaMuraglia, Glenn M.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01.06.2005
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Reoperative carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an accepted treatment for recurrent carotid stenosis. With reports of a higher operative morbidity than primary CEA and the advent of carotid stenting, catheter-based therapy has been advocated as the primary treatment for this reportedly “high-risk” subgroup. This study reviews a contemporary experience with reoperative CEA to validate the high-risk categorization of these patients. From 1989 to 2002, 153 consecutive, isolated (excluding CEA/coronary artery bypass graft and carotid bypass operations) reoperative CEA procedures were reviewed. Clinical and demographic variables potentially associated with the end points of perioperative morbidity, long-term durability, and late survival were assessed with multivariate analysis. There were 153 reoperative CEA procedures in 145 patients (56% men, 36% symptomatic) with an average age of 69 ± 1.3 years. The average time from primary CEA (68% primary closure, 23% prosthetic, 9% vein patch) to reoperative CEA was 6.1 ± 0.4 years (range, 0.3 to 20.4 years). At reoperation, patch reconstruction was undertaken in 93% of cases. The perioperative stroke rate was 1.9%, with no deaths or cardiac complications. Other complications included cranial nerve injury (1.3%) and hematoma (3.2%). Average follow-up after reoperative CEA was 4.4 ± 0.3 years (range, 0.1 to 12.7 years), with an overall total stroke-free rate of 96% and a restenosis rate (>50%) by carotid duplex of 9.2%. Among variables assessed for association with restenosis after reoperative CEA, only younger age was found to be significant (66 ± 2.5 years vs 70 ± 0.7 years, P < .05). The all-cause long-term mortality rate was 29%. Multivariate analysis of long-term survival identified diabetes mellitus as having a negative impact (hazard ratio, 3.4 ± 0.3, P < .05) and lipid-lowering agents as having a protective effect (hazard ratio, 0.42 ± 0.4, P < .05) on survival. Reoperative CEA is a safe and durable procedure, comparable to reported standards for primary CEA, for long-term protection from stroke. These data do not support the contention that patients who require reoperative CEA constitute a “high-risk” subgroup in whom reoperative therapy should be avoided.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0741-5214
1097-6809
DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2005.02.047