Maitotoxin induces two dose-dependent conductances in Xenopus oocytes. Comparison with nystatin effects as a pore inductor
Maitotoxin (MTX)-induced conductances in Xenopus oocytes were thoroughly characterized using the two-electrode voltage clamp technique with a hyperpolarizing voltage protocol. MTX 5–100 pM induced an inward current with maximal amplitude between 0.1 and 10 μA. The kinetics of this current had rising...
Saved in:
Published in | Toxicon (Oxford) Vol. 51; no. 5; pp. 797 - 812 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
01.04.2008
Elsevier Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Maitotoxin (MTX)-induced conductances in
Xenopus oocytes were thoroughly characterized using the two-electrode voltage clamp technique with a hyperpolarizing voltage protocol. MTX 5–100
pM induced an inward current with maximal amplitude between 0.1 and 10
μA. The kinetics of this current had rising and decaying phases, which were non-voltage dependent. Its reversal potential (
E
rev) was close to 0
mV in high K
+ or Na
+ external solution, indicating the participation of non-selective cation channels (NSCC). A second conductance was developed at MTX doses higher than 200
pM whose amplitude increased continuously. This current showed a large instantaneous component and a voltage-independent decay, as well as similar selectivity for Na
+ and K
+ ions (
E
rev≈0
mV). Moreover, the maximal current amplitude was about 34% bigger in high K
+ than in high Na
+. The MTX effect was reversible at all doses in pM range. All the properties found are similar to those of NSCC. The differences in the current kinetics suggest that the MTX-elicited currents reflect the activation of two sets of voltage-independent NSCC. As MTX has been proposed to act by forming pores directly into the plasma membrane, we compared its effects with those of nystatin, a well-known membrane pore inductor. We found strong differences between the effects of both substances suggesting different mechanisms for these drugs. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0041-0101 1879-3150 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.toxicon.2007.12.013 |