Testing Distinct Three-Dimensional Effects in Laparoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Trial Using the Lübecker Toolbox Curriculum

• Published in: Visceral medicine Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 113 - 123
• Main Authors: Thomaschewski, Michael, Jürgens, Thorsten, Benecke, Claudia, Griesmann, Anna-Catherina, Esnaashari, Hamed, Lux, Romy, Scheppan, Diana, Simon, Ronja, Keck, Tobias, Laubert, Tilman
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel, Switzerland S. Karger GmbH 01.04.2020
• Subjects: Research Article; 3D laparoscopy; Laparoscopic surgery; Stereo base; Imaging; Surgical training
• ISBN: 3318067660; 9783318067668
• ISSN: 2297-4725; 2297-475X
• DOI: 10.1159/000506059

Background: The use of stereoscopic laparoscopic systems in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) allows a three-dimensional (3D) view of the surgical field, which improves hand-eye coordination. Depending on the stereo base used in the construction of the endoscopes, 3D systems may differ regarding the 3D effect. Our aim was to investigate the influence of different stereo bases on the 3D effect. Methods: This was a prospective randomized study involving 42 MIS-inexperienced study participants. We evaluated two laparoscopic 3D systems with stereo bases of 2.5 mm (system A) and 3.8 mm (system B) for differences in learning MIS skills using the Lübeck Toolbox (LTB) video box trainer. We evaluated participants’ performance regarding the times and repetitions required to reach each exercise’s goal. After completing the final exercise (“suturing”), participants performed the exercise again using a two-dimensional (2D) representation. Additionally, we retrospectively compared our study results with a preliminary study from participants completing the LTB curriculum with a 2D system. Results: The median number of repetitions until reaching the goals for LTB exercises 1, 2, 3, and 6 for system A were: 18 (range 7–53), 24 (range 8–46), 24 (range 13–51), and 21 (range 10–46), respectively, and for system B were: 12 (range 2–30), 16 (range 6–43), 17 (range 4–47), and 15 (range 6–29), respectively (p = not significant). Changing from a 3D to a 2D representation after completing the learning curve led to a longer average time required, from 95.22 to 119.3 s (p < 0.0001), for the last exercise (exercise 6; “suturing”). When comparing the results retrospectively with the learning curves acquired with the 2D system, there was a significant reduction in the number of repetitions required to reach the LTB exercise goals for exercises 1, 3, and 6 using the 3D system. Conclusion: Stereo bases of 2.5 and 3.8 mm provide acceptable bases for designing 3D systems. Additionally, our results indicated that MIS basic skills can be learned quicker using a 3D system versus a 2D system, and that when the 3D effect is eliminated, the corresponding compensatory mechanisms must be relearned.