A Neurochemical Basis for Phenotypic Differentiation in Alzheimer's Disease? Turing's Morphogens Revisited

A theoretical framework for understanding morphological differentiation in biological systems was first outlined in now classic work by Turing (1952), who showed computationally that diffusion of two or more tissue chemicals or “morphogens” reacting across an embryonic cellular network is sufficient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in aging neuroscience Vol. 9; p. 76
Main Authors Whittaker, Heather T, Warren, Jason D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 29.03.2017
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A theoretical framework for understanding morphological differentiation in biological systems was first outlined in now classic work by Turing (1952), who showed computationally that diffusion of two or more tissue chemicals or “morphogens” reacting across an embryonic cellular network is sufficient to scale initial random fluctuations into stable, often strikingly asymmetric patterns. Turing showed that it is relatively straightforward mathematically to extend the reaction–diffusion framework of “homogeneity breakdown” from a ring to a sphere (or shell) of cells. Since Turing's original formulation, his theory has been shown to hold for an extraordinary variety of applications, ranging from coat pigmentation patterns in animals to predator-prey relationships in ecosystems, crime hotspots in communities, sand ripples, and galaxy formation (Murray, 1990; Ball, 2015). Each panel shows a schematic axial projection of the cerebral hemispheres and the top left panel indicates key anatomical regions, including components of the “default-mode network” (in bold italics): aTL, anterior temporal lobe; FP, frontal pole; hip, hippocampus; iFC, inferior frontal cortex; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; TPJ, temporo-parietal junction; OC, occipital cortex; pCC, posterior cingulate cortex. In particular, Turing activation patterns emerge where the firing rates of connected neurons are governed by disproportionate excitatory vs. inhibitory inputs acting over different spatial ranges. Besides physical diffusion between neurons (Warren et al., 2013), tau and beta-amyloid have complex effects on synaptic and neurotransmitter physiology that might establish such Turing field effects.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Christos Frantzidis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Reviewed by: Rik Vandenberghe, KU Leuven, Belgium; Moira Steyn-Ross, University of Waikato, New Zealand
ISSN:1663-4365
1663-4365
DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00076