A structured review of the effect of economic incentives on consumers' preventive behavior

Improving participation in preventive activities will require finding methods to encourage consumers to engage in and remain in such efforts. This review assesses the effects of economic incentives on consumers' preventive health behaviors. A study was classified as complex preventive health if...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of preventive medicine Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 327 - 352
Main Authors Kane, Robert L., Johnson, Paul E., Town, Robert J., Butler, Mary
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.11.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Improving participation in preventive activities will require finding methods to encourage consumers to engage in and remain in such efforts. This review assesses the effects of economic incentives on consumers' preventive health behaviors. A study was classified as complex preventive health if a sustained behavior change was required of the consumer; if it could be accomplished directly (e.g., immunizations), it was considered simple. A systematic literature review identified 111 randomized controlled trials of which 47 (published between 1966 and 2002) met the criteria for review. The economic incentives worked 73% of the time (74% for simple, and 72% for complex). Rates varied by the goal of the incentive. Incentives that increased ability to purchase the preventive service worked better than more diffuse incentives, but the type matters less than the nature of the incentive. Economic incentives are effective in the short run for simple preventive care, and distinct, well-defined behavioral goals. Small incentives can produce finite changes, but it is not clear what size of incentive is needed to yield a major sustained effect.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0749-3797
1873-2607
DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.07.002