Variations in the management of adolescents with blunt splenic trauma in England and Wales: are we preserving enough?

• Published in: Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Vol. 102; no. 7; pp. 488 - 492
• Main Authors: Green, P A, Wilkinson, D J, Bouamra, O, Fragoso, M, Farrelly, P J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.09.2020; Royal College of Surgeons
• Subjects: Abdominal Injuries - diagnosis; Abdominal Injuries - therapy; Adolescent; Adults; Age groups; Blood transfusions; Child; Disease Management; Embolization; England; Female; Humans; Injuries; Injury Severity Score; Male; Mortality; Paediatric Surgery; Patients; Pediatrics; Retrospective Studies; Spleen - diagnostic imaging; Spleen - injuries; Teenagers; Trauma; Trauma Centers; Trauma Severity Indices; Wales; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnosis; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - therapy; Young Adult; England; Wales; United Kingdom > UK; Splenic trauma; Outcomes
• ISSN: 0035-8843; 1478-7083
• DOI: 10.1308/RCSANN.2020.0053

Management of blunt splenic injury has changed drastically with non-operative management increasingly used in paediatric and adult patients. Studies from America and Australia demonstrate disparities in care of patients treated at paediatric and adult centres. This study assessed management of splenic injuries in UK adolescents. Data were acquired from the Trauma Audit and Research Network on isolated blunt splenic injuries reported 2006-2015. Adolescents were divided into age groups of 11-15 years and 16-20 years, and injuries classified as minor (grades 1/2) or major (3+). Primary outcomes were needed for splenectomy and blood transfusion. A total of 445 adolescents suffered isolated blunt splenic injuries. Road traffic collisions were the most common mechanism. There were no deaths as a result of isolated blunt splenic injuries, but 49 (11%) adolescents needed transfusions and 105 (23.6%) underwent splenectomies. There was no significant difference observed in the management of adolescents with minor trauma. In major trauma, 11-15-year-olds were more likely to have splenectomies when managed at local trauma units compared with major trauma centres (31% vs 4%, odds ratio 11.5; 95% confidence interval 3.82-34.38, < 0.0001). Within major trauma centres, older adolescents were more likely to have splenectomies than younger adolescents (35.5% vs 3.8%, odds ratio 14; 95% confidence interval 4.55-43.26, < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in haemodynamic status, transfusion requirement or embolisation rates. There appears to be a large variation in the management of isolated blunt splenic injuries in the UK. The reasons for this remain unclear however non-operative management is safe and should be first line management in the haemodynamically stable adolescent, even with major splenic injuries.