Effects of Smaller Physical Size on Complex Arterial Grafting in Coronary Artery Operations
The trend in coronary artery bypass grafting is for a gradual transition to the more extensive use of arterial grafts. This study was designed to investigate the effects of patient body size on complex arterial grafting in coronary artery bypass procedures. Four hundred forty-five patients who under...
Saved in:
Published in | The Annals of thoracic surgery Vol. 62; no. 3; pp. 733 - 736 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01.09.1996
Elsevier Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The trend in coronary artery bypass grafting is for a gradual transition to the more extensive use of arterial grafts. This study was designed to investigate the effects of patient body size on complex arterial grafting in coronary artery bypass procedures.
Four hundred forty-five patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with two or more distal anastomoses using arterial grafts were divided into two groups according to body surface area: group A (n = 114), 1.60m2 or less; and group B (n = 331), greater than 1.60m2. Preoperative patient characteristics and early and long-term results were compared between the groups.
The prevalence of female sex (27% in group A versus 0.9% in group B; p < 0.0001) and age (62.7±8.1 years in group A versus 58.9±7.0 years in group B; p < 0.001) were significantly different. However, the prevalence of previous myocardial infarction and of left ventricular dysfunction and the extent of coronary artery disease were not significantly different. Three patients (2.6%) in group A and 3 patients (0.9%) in group B died within 30 days of operation (p = 0.18). The 1-month patency rate of arterial grafts was not significantly different (98.7% versus 96.7%; p = 0.16), but that of venous grafts was significantly lower in group A than in group B (88.9% versus 97.7%; p = 0.045). No significant difference was noted in the 3-year actuarial survival rate (93.8% versus 91.6%).
The extensive use of arterial grafts in patients with small body size was associated with excellent long-term results, with no significant increase in operative mortality or morbidity. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0003-4975 1552-6259 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0003-4975(96)00281-4 |