Association between glycemic index, glycemic load, and fructose with insulin resistance: the CDC of the Canary Islands study

Background The involvement of carbohydrates in triggering insulin resistance (IR) remains a source of controversy. Aim of the study To study the relation between glycemic index (GI), glycemic load (GL), and fructose with insulin resistance in a predominantly rural population in the Canary Islands. M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of nutrition Vol. 49; no. 8; pp. 505 - 512
Main Authors DOMINGUEZ COELLO, Santiago, DE LEON, Antonio Cabrera, RODRIGUEZ PEREZ, María C, BORGES ALAMO, Carlos, CARRILLO FERNANDEZ, Lourdes, GONZALEZ, Delia Almeida, GARCIA YANES, Jezabel, GONZALEZ HERNANDEZ, Ana, BRITO DIAZ, Buenaventura, AGUIRRE-JAIME, Armando
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag 01.12.2010
Springer-Verlag
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background The involvement of carbohydrates in triggering insulin resistance (IR) remains a source of controversy. Aim of the study To study the relation between glycemic index (GI), glycemic load (GL), and fructose with insulin resistance in a predominantly rural population in the Canary Islands. Methods Cross-sectional study carried out in 668 nondiabetic people aged 18-75. IR was estimated with serum glucose and C-peptide (HOMA2-IR). Nutrient intakes were obtained from a validated food frequency questionnaire. ANOVA was used to analyze nutrient distribution across quartiles of HOMA2-IR. Four multivariate nutrient density models (dependent variable: log-transformed HOMA2-IR) which differed only in the kinds of carbohydrates included were tested (Model 1: carbohydrates; Model 2: GI and then GL; Model 3: free fructose, other simple sugars and starch; Model 4: total fructose, remaining sugars and starch). Results There was no association between GI and IR. There was a direct association between GL (P < 0.001), fructose (free [P = 0.001], total [P = 0.013]), energy intake (P < 0.001), fruit fiber (<0.001), and glucose (P = 0.003) with IR. There was an inverse association between cereal (P = 0.008) and vegetable fiber (P < 0.001) and IR. Multivariate models corroborated the association of carbohydrates, GL, fructose, vegetable fiber, and energy intake with IR. The association between GL and IR disappeared when Model 2 was adjusted by total fructose intake. Conclusions There was a direct association between fructose intake and IR. There was no relationship between GI and IR. Although a direct association of GL with IR was detected, it was attributable to the consumption of fructose.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-010-0110-2
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1436-6207
1436-6215
DOI:10.1007/s00394-010-0110-2