Uniformity versus Flexibility: Evidence from Pricing of the Pension Obligation

• Published in: The Accounting review Vol. 82; no. 1; pp. 107 - 137
• Main Authors: Hann, Rebecca N., Lu, Yvonne Y., Subramanyam, K. R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Sarasota American Accounting Association 01.01.2007
• Subjects: Accounting theory; Business management; Coefficients; Corporate finance; Defined benefit pension plan; Defined benefit plans; Discount rates; Employee pension plans; Estimation methods; Financial information; Financial management; Financial models; Flexibility; GAAP; Industrial market; Market prices; Obligations; Pension funds; Pension liabilities; Pension plans; Pricing; Stock prices; Studies; United States > US
• ISSN: 0001-4826; 1558-7967
• DOI: 10.2308/accr.2007.82.1.107

We functionally derive the discretionary component of the pension obligation (PBO) based on deviation of actuarial assumptions-discount rate and compensation growth rate-from their respective industry medians. We then examine the implications of allowing discretion in the choice of pension assumptions on the pricing of the PBO. We find no evidence that discretion-as currently allowed under U.S. GAAP-impairs the value relevance of the PBO. We also find that the discretionary component is incrementally value-relevant beyond the nondiscretionary component. Additional analyses suggest that these results are unlikely attributable to market fixation on reported PBO or measurement error in our discretionary component. Overall, we find that imposing uniformity in the choice of pension assumptions, on average, prevents communication of value-relevant information through the PBO.