Estimating light absorption by chlorophyll, leaf and canopy in a deciduous broadleaf forest using MODIS data and a radiative transfer model

In this paper, we present a theoretical and modeling framework to estimate the fractions of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) absorbed by vegetation canopy (FAPAR canopy), leaf (FAPAR leaf ), and chlorophyll (FAPAR chl), respectively. FAPAR canopy is an important biophysical variable and has...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRemote sensing of environment Vol. 99; no. 3; pp. 357 - 371
Main Authors Zhang, Qingyuan, Xiao, Xiangming, Braswell, Bobby, Linder, Ernst, Baret, Fred, Moore, Berrien
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 30.11.2005
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this paper, we present a theoretical and modeling framework to estimate the fractions of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) absorbed by vegetation canopy (FAPAR canopy), leaf (FAPAR leaf ), and chlorophyll (FAPAR chl), respectively. FAPAR canopy is an important biophysical variable and has been used to estimate gross and net primary production. However, only PAR absorbed by chlorophyll is used for photosynthesis, and therefore there is a need to quantify FAPAR chl. We modified and coupled a leaf radiative transfer model (PROSPECT) and a canopy radiative transfer model (SAIL-2), and incorporated a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method (the Metropolis algorithm) for model inversion, which provides probability distributions of the retrieved variables. Our two-step procedure is: (1) to retrieve biophysical and biochemical variables using coupled PROSPECT + SAIL-2 model (PROSAIL-2), combined with multiple daily images (five spectral bands) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor; and (2) to calculate FAPAR canopy, FAPAR leaf and FAPAR chl with the estimated model variables from the first step. We evaluated our approach for a temperate forest area in the Northeastern US, using MODIS data from 2001 to 2003. The inverted PROSAIL-2 fit the observed MODIS reflectance data well for the five MODIS spectral bands. The estimated leaf area index (LAI) values are within the range of field measured data. Significant differences between FAPAR canopy and FAPAR chl are found for this test case. Our study demonstrates the potential for using a model such as PROSAIL-2, combined with an inverse approach, for quantifying FAPAR chl, FAPAR leaf, FAPAR canopy, biophysical variables, and biochemical variables for deciduous broadleaf forests at leaf- and canopy-levels over time.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0034-4257
1879-0704
DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2005.09.009