Blood loss in major liposuction procedures: a comparison study using suction-assisted versus ultrasonically assisted lipoplasty

• Published in: Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) Vol. 108; no. 1; p. 241
• Main Authors: Karmo, F R, Milan, M F, Silbergleit, A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.07.2001
• Subjects: Blood Loss, Surgical; Blood Volume; Female; Hemoglobins - analysis; Humans; Lipectomy - instrumentation; Lipectomy - methods; Prospective Studies; Suction; Ultrasonics
• ISSN: 0032-1052
• DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200107000-00039

The blood loss that accompanies liposuction procedures has always been a concern. Tumescent injection of the targeted area of liposuction with dilute lidocaine and epinephrine solution has minimized intraoperative blood loss. Proponents of a newer ultrasonically assisted lipoplasty technique have claimed many benefits over traditional suction-assisted lipoplasty. However, few quantitative data are available on the intraoperative blood loss and the significance of postoperative anemia using the ultrasonic method. A prospective clinical observational design was used to investigate 38 patients undergoing suction-assisted lipoplasty and 37 patients undergoing ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty in whom the liposuction aspirate was expected to be more than 1000 ml. These patients were investigated with preoperative measurement of hemoglobin, platelet count, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, and postoperative measurement of hemoglobin on the seventh postoperative day. In addition, hemoglobin concentration and whole blood volume were calculated from the infranatant portion of the liposuction aspirate. The mean +/- SD volume of the liposuction aspirate was 2901 +/- 1471 ml for suction-assisted compared with 2741 +/- 1086 ml for ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. The mean +/- SD of whole blood volume in liposuction aspirate per case was 36 +/- 50.82 ml for suction-assisted lipoplasty and 36 +/- 28.62 ml for ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. The mean +/- SD of the preoperative hemoglobin concentration was 13.93 +/- 0.99 g/dl for suction-assisted lipoplasty and 14.05 +/- 1.16 g/dl for ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty, whereas the mean +/- SD of the postoperative hemoglobin concentration was 13 +/- 1.42 g/dl for suction-assisted lipoplasty and 13.05 +/- 1.32 g/dl for ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. The mean decrease in hemoglobin on the seventh postoperative day was 0.93 +/- 0.92 g/dl for suction-assisted lipoplasty and 1 +/- 0.64 g/dl for ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. The volume of whole blood loss was estimated to be 12.4 ml in each 1000 ml of liposuction aspirate when using suction-assisted lipoplasty versus 13.1 ml when using ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. All procedures were done under general anesthesia, and patients were discharged home on the same day. No blood transfusion was required. This study shows that blood loss using the ultrasonic technique is slightly higher, though insignificant, than when using suction. However, this study did not demonstrate a difference in the postoperative hemoglobin decrease between the two techniques.