Neurologic safety event rates in the SENTIS trial control population
Background Adverse event (AE) rates for interventional stroke trials are not well established. Aims We prospectively evaluated control arm AEs from a randomized stroke trial to establish expected rates of neurologic AEs. Methods Control data from the Safety and Efficacy of NeuroFlo Technology in Isc...
Saved in:
Published in | Acta neurologica Scandinavica Vol. 127; no. 2; pp. e5 - e7 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Denmark
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.02.2013
Hindawi Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Adverse event (AE) rates for interventional stroke trials are not well established.
Aims
We prospectively evaluated control arm AEs from a randomized stroke trial to establish expected rates of neurologic AEs.
Methods
Control data from the Safety and Efficacy of NeuroFlo Technology in Ischemic Stroke (SENTIS) Trial were evaluated. Patients were ≥ 18 years with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores 5–18 within 14 h of stroke onset. Follow‐up was 90 days. Neurological AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) were adjudicated and the following defined times used to determine treatment relatedness: 24‐h imaging for intracranial hemorrhage (ICnH) including hemorrhagic transformation, 7 days each for cerebral edema and neurologic worsening/stroke progression, and 30 days for new ischemic strokes.
Results
The control group included 257 patients, 49.4% female, mean age of 68.3 years, and median NIHSS of 10. Neurologic AEs occurred at the following rates: ICnH 27.6%, cerebral edema 6.6%, neurologic worsening 18.3%, and new stroke 4.7%. Most of these events occurred within the defined times: ICnH 74.6%, cerebral edema 94.1%, neurologic worsening 87.2%, and new stroke 83.3%.
Conclusions
SENTIS Trial control arm neurologic events provide estimates of expected AE rates and defined times that can be used for future stroke trial's safety assessments. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:DC642B15E924EFDA07A4841B5AB2346AD1B37B6C ArticleID:ANE12005 ark:/67375/WNG-C10M3HKK-M ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0001-6314 1600-0404 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ane.12005 |