"Solvent Annealing" Effect in Polymer Solar Cells Based on Poly(3-hexylthiophene) and Methanofullerenes

The self‐organization of the polymer in solar cells based on regioregular poly(3‐hexylthiophene) (RR‐P3HT):[6,6]‐phenyl C61‐butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) is studied systematically as a function of the spin‐coating time ts (varied from 20–80 s), which controls the solvent annealing time ta, the ti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAdvanced functional materials Vol. 17; no. 10; pp. 1636 - 1644
Main Authors Li, G., Yao, Y., Yang, H., Shrotriya, V., Yang, G., Yang, Y.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Weinheim WILEY-VCH Verlag 09.07.2007
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The self‐organization of the polymer in solar cells based on regioregular poly(3‐hexylthiophene) (RR‐P3HT):[6,6]‐phenyl C61‐butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) is studied systematically as a function of the spin‐coating time ts (varied from 20–80 s), which controls the solvent annealing time ta, the time taken by the solvent to dry after the spin‐coating process. These blend films are characterized by photoluminescence spectroscopy, UV‐vis absorption spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, and grazing incidence X‐ray diffraction (GIXRD) measurements. The results indicate that the π‐conjugated structure of RR‐P3HT in the films is optimally developed when ta is greater than 1 min (ts ∼ 50 s). For ts < 50 s, both the short‐circuit current (JSC) and the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the corresponding polymer solar cells show a plateau region, whereas for 50 < ts < 55 s, the JSC and PCE values are significantly decreased, suggesting that there is a major change in the ordering of the polymer in this time window. The PCE decreases from 3.6 % for a film with a highly ordered π‐conjugated structure of RR‐P3HT to 1.2 % for a less‐ordered film. GIXRD results confirm the change in the ordering of the polymer. In particular, the incident photon‐to‐electron conversion efficiency spectrum of the less‐ordered solar cell shows a clear loss in both the overall magnitude and the long‐wavelength response. The solvent annealing effect is also studied for devices with different concentrations of PCBM (PCBM concentrations ranging from 25 to 67 wt %). Under “solvent annealing” conditions, the polymer is seen to be ordered even at 67 wt % PCBM loading. The open‐circuit voltage (VOC) is also affected by the ordering of the polymer and the PCBM loading in the active layer. Polymer solar cells based on poly(3‐hexylthiophene) and methanofullerenes are investigated by systematically varying the spin‐coating time used during fabrication (see figure). The rate of solvent evaporation profoundly effects the self‐organization of the polymer. Very high crystallinity of the polymer and consequently optimal solar‐cell performance is achieved for longer “solvent annealing” times.
Bibliography:istex:0FA1A2ED7E86920523ADD27CAD62CC4998446A2D
University of California Discovery Grant
ark:/67375/WNG-S831TX4P-0
G. Li and Y. Yao contributed equally to this work. The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) (Grant number N00 014-04-1-0434), Solarmer Energy Inc., University of California Discovery Grant, and the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Institute of the National Science Foundation (NSF) (Grant number DMR 0 117 792). Technical discussions with Dr. Brian  Gregg of NREL are greatly appreciated.
Solarmer Energy Inc.
Office of Naval Research (ONR) - No. N00 014-04-1-0434
ArticleID:ADFM200600624
Nanoscale Science and Engineering Institute of the National Science Foundation (NSF) - No. DMR 0 117 792
G. Li and Y. Yao contributed equally to this work. The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) (Grant number N00 014‐04‐1‐0434), Solarmer Energy Inc., University of California Discovery Grant, and the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Institute of the National Science Foundation (NSF) (Grant number DMR 0 117 792). Technical discussions with Dr. Brian  Gregg of NREL are greatly appreciated.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1616-301X
1616-3028
DOI:10.1002/adfm.200600624