Contrast-enhanced sonography for the identification of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: Systematic review and meta-analysis
ABSTRACT Purpose The use of contrast‐enhanced sonography (CEUS) has yielded promising results in the differentiation of thyroid nodules. We conducted this meta‐analysis to assess its performance in identifying and distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Methods PubMed, Medline,...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of clinical ultrasound Vol. 44; no. 4; pp. 199 - 209 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.05.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ABSTRACT
Purpose
The use of contrast‐enhanced sonography (CEUS) has yielded promising results in the differentiation of thyroid nodules. We conducted this meta‐analysis to assess its performance in identifying and distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
Methods
PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published through the end of December 2013. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve were calculated.
Results
A total of 13 studies were included in this meta‐analysis. For the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules worldwide, the overall mean rates of sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88–93%) and 86% (95% CI, 83–89%), respectively. The summary diagnostic odds ratio was 52.83 (95% CI, 21.71–128.55), and the area under the curve for the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90–0.98).
Conclusions
This meta‐analysis indicates that CEUS may be a valuable supplemental method, with high rates of sensitivity and specificity, to use for identifying and distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 44:199–209, 2016 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-MHNQVG8S-Z istex:D6A2E8319BA5F9F4B4D426348282DD5F808EAE1A ArticleID:JCU22311 These authors contributed equally to this work. ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Review-4 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0091-2751 1097-0096 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jcu.22311 |