Contemporary human-altered landscapes and oceanic barriers reduce bumble bee gene flow
Much of the world's terrestrial landscapes are being altered by humans in the form of agriculture, urbanization and pastoral systems, with major implications for biodiversity. Bumble bees are one of the most effective pollinators in both natural and cultivated landscapes, but are often the firs...
Saved in:
Published in | Molecular ecology Vol. 24; no. 5; pp. 993 - 1006 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Much of the world's terrestrial landscapes are being altered by humans in the form of agriculture, urbanization and pastoral systems, with major implications for biodiversity. Bumble bees are one of the most effective pollinators in both natural and cultivated landscapes, but are often the first to be extirpated in human‐altered habitats. Yet, little is known about the role of natural and human‐altered habitats in promoting or limiting bumble bee gene flow. In this study, I closely examine the genetic structure of the yellow‐faced bumble bee, Bombus vosnesenskii, across the southwestern US coast and find strong evidence that natural oceanic barriers, as well as contemporary human‐altered habitats, limit bee gene flow. Heterozygosity and allelic richness were lower in island populations, while private allelic richness was higher in island populations compared to mainland populations. Genetic differentiation, measured for three indices across the 1000 km study region, was significantly greater than the null expectation (FST = 0.041, F’ST = 0.044 and Dest = 0.155) and correlated with geographic distance. Furthermore, genetic differentiation patterns were most strongly correlated with contemporary (2011) not past (2006, 2001) resistance maps calibrated for high dispersal limitation over oceans, impervious habitat and croplands. Despite the incorporation of dramatic elevation gradients, the analyses reveal that oceans and contemporary human land use, not mountains, are the primary dispersal barriers for B. vosnesenskii gene flow. These findings reinforce the importance of maintaining corridors of suitable habitat across the distribution range of native pollinators to promote their persistence and safeguard their ability to provide essential pollination services. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | National Geographic Society istex:D9495981D43E91894605071954693CC8ACF4C243 ArticleID:MEC13090 ark:/67375/WNG-4HVXXNCK-H Fig. S1 Estimated population structure of B. vosnesenskii using STRUCTURE (Pritchard & Wen ) and TESS (Durand et al. ) (top and bottom panels, respectively) for (A) K = 4 and (B) K = 5 groups, with biogeographic region of sampling (Island, Coastal, and Sierra) and population IDs labeled (see Table S1, Supporting information). Table S1 Genetic diversity within populations. Table S2 (A) MRDM results investigating Geographic Distance (Geo), Elevation Resistance Distance (Elev), and Land Use Resistance Distance (Land) for 2001, 2006, and 2011 and their relation to differentiation, F?ST (N=210 pairs). Table S3 (A) MRDM results investigating Geographic Distance (Geo), Elevation Resistance Distance (Elev), and Land Use Resistance Distance (Land) for 2001, 2006, and 2011 and their relation to differentiation, Dest (N=210 pairs). Table S4 MLPE results investigating Geographic Distance (Geo), Elevation Resistance Distance (Elev), and Land Use Resistance Distances (Land Use) for 2001, 2006, and 2011 and their relation to differentiation, F?ST (N=210 pairs). Table S5 MLPE results investigating Geographic Distance (Geo), Elevation Resistance Distance (Elev), and Land Use Resistance Distances (Land Use) for 2001, 2006, and 2011 and their relation to differentiation, Dest (N=210 pairs). National Science Foundation ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0962-1083 1365-294X |
DOI: | 10.1111/mec.13090 |