Biomarkers of ketamine’s antidepressant effect: a clinical review of genetics, functional connectivity, and neurophysiology

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and all-cause mortality (including suicide) worldwide, and, unfortunately, first-line monoaminergic antidepressants and evidence-based psychotherapies are not effective for all patients. Subanesthetic doses of the N-methyl-D-a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChronic Stress Vol. 5; p. 24705470211014210
Main Authors Alario, Alexandra A., Niciu, Mark J.
Format Book Review Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 2021
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and all-cause mortality (including suicide) worldwide, and, unfortunately, first-line monoaminergic antidepressants and evidence-based psychotherapies are not effective for all patients. Subanesthetic doses of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists and glutamate modulators ketamine and S-ketamine have rapid and robust antidepressant efficacy in such treatment-resistant depressed patients (TRD). Yet, as with all antidepressant treatments including electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), not all TRD patients adequately respond, and we are presently unable to a priori predict who will respond or not respond to ketamine. Therefore, antidepressant treatment response biomarkers to ketamine have been a major focus of research for over a decade. In this article, we review the evidence in support of treatment response biomarkers, with a particular focus on genetics, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and neurophysiological studies, i.e. electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. The studies outlined here lay the groundwork for replication and dissemination.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:2470-5470
2470-5470
DOI:10.1177/24705470211014210