Neurodevelopmental outcomes of tracheoesophageal fistulas

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to perform a retrospective review of tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) patients who followed up in a state-sponsored program to assess neurodevelopmental outcomes. Methods Records were reviewed retrospectively of children who underwent TEF repair between...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of pediatric surgery Vol. 51; no. 5; pp. 743 - 747
Main Authors Newton, Laura Elyce, Abdessalam, Shahab F, Raynor, Stephen C, Lyden, Elizabeth R, Rush, Eric T, Needelman, Howard, Cusick, Robert A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to perform a retrospective review of tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) patients who followed up in a state-sponsored program to assess neurodevelopmental outcomes. Methods Records were reviewed retrospectively of children who underwent TEF repair between August 2001 and June 2014. Children discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit were referred to the state-sponsored Developmental Tracking Infant Progress Statewide (TIPS) program. We reviewed TIPS assessments performed before age 24 months and noted referral for early school intervention services. Poor outcomes were defined as scores of “failure” on the screening assessment or referral for enrollment in early intervention services by 24 months. Children with TEF were compared with case-matched nonsyndromic children of similar gestational age and birth weight. Results Seventy-eight children underwent TEF repair. Thirty-eight followed up with TIPS. Survival was 93.6%. Predictors of hospital survival were Waterston classification (p = 0.001), birth weight (p = 0.027), and ventilator days (p = 0.013). LOS was the only significant predictor of referral for early intervention services (p = 0.0092) in multivariate analysis. There was a borderline significant difference in referral rate between children with TEF and controls. 52.6% of TEF patients were referred, while 34.2% of controls were referred (p = 0.071). Conclusion Over half of TEF patients experience neurodevelopmental delays requiring referral for early intervention (53%).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-3468
1531-5037
DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.015