Molecular marker variability for southern root-knot nematode resistance in sweetpotato

Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) marker profiles for individuals in two F1 populations of sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam] were used in association studies to identify AFLP markers suitable for identification of plants possessing a resistant reaction to southern root-knot nematode...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuphytica Vol. 144; no. 1-2; pp. 125 - 132
Main Authors Mcharo, M, LaBonte, D.R, Clark, C, Hoy, M, Oard, J.H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer 01.07.2005
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) marker profiles for individuals in two F1 populations of sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam] were used in association studies to identify AFLP markers suitable for identification of plants possessing a resistant reaction to southern root-knot nematode race 3 [Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White) Chitwood]. Population one consisted of 48 half-sib genotypes developed at the Louisiana State University (LSU) AgCenter. The second population consisted of 54 full-sibs developed by the East African and International Potato Center (CIP) sweetpotato breeding programs. Results for plant nematode resistance indicate a bimodal distribution among the genotypes for the LSU population and a normal distribution for the CIP population. Using analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) at P < 0.001 and two multivariate analysis techniques i.e logistic regression and discriminant analysis, 5 and 4 AFLP markers that had a strong and significant association with respect to the resistance trait were selected for the LSU and CIP populations, respectively. A comparative analysis of the power of discriminant analysis models for southern root-knot nematode resistance class prediction achieved 88.78% (LSU) and 88.04% (CIP) classification efficiencies.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-5271-3
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0014-2336
1573-5060
DOI:10.1007/s10681-005-5271-3