Thermal behavior of modified urea–formaldehyde resins

The thermal stability of pure urea–formaldehyde resin (PR) and modified urea–formaldehyde (UF) resins with hexamethylenetetramine-HMTA (Resin 1), melamine-M (Resin 2), and ethylene urea (EU, Resin 3) including nano-SiO 2 was investigated by non-isothermal thermo-gravimetric analysis (TG), differenti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of thermal analysis and calorimetry Vol. 104; no. 3; pp. 1159 - 1166
Main Authors Samarzija-Jovanovic, Suzana, Jovanovic, Vojislav, Konstantinovic, Sandra, Markovic, Gordana, Marinovic-Cincovic, Milena
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.06.2011
Springer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The thermal stability of pure urea–formaldehyde resin (PR) and modified urea–formaldehyde (UF) resins with hexamethylenetetramine-HMTA (Resin 1), melamine-M (Resin 2), and ethylene urea (EU, Resin 3) including nano-SiO 2 was investigated by non-isothermal thermo-gravimetric analysis (TG), differential thermal gravimetry (DTG), and differential thermal analysis (DTA) supported by data from IR spectroscopy. Possibility of combining inorganic filler in a form of silicon dioxide with UF resins was found investigated and percentage of free formaldehyde was determined. The shift of DTG peaks to a high temperature indicates the increase of thermal stability of modified UF resin with EU (Resin 3) which is confirmed by data obtained from the FTIR study. The minimum percentage (6%) of free formaldehyde was obtained in Resin 3.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1388-6150
1588-2926
1572-8943
DOI:10.1007/s10973-010-1143-8