Repair of Pre-cracked Reinforced Concrete (RC) Beams with Openings Strengthened Using FRP Sheets Under Sustained Load

• Published in: International journal of concrete structures and materials Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 171 - 183
• Main Authors: Osman, Bashir H., Wu, Erjun, Ji, Bohai, Abdulhameed, Suhaib S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht 한국콘크리트학회 01.03.2017; Springer Netherlands; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Building Materials; Engineering; Solid Mechanics; Structural Materials; 토목공학; AFRP strengthening; pre-cracked; beam with openings; RC beaam
• ISSN: 1976-0485; 2234-1315
• DOI: 10.1007/s40069-016-0182-3

Strengthening reinforced concrete (RC) beams with openings by using aramid fiber reinforcement polymers (AFRP) on the beams’ surfaces offers a useful solution for upgrading concrete structures to carry heavy loads. This paper presents a repairing technique of the AFRP sheets that effectively strengthens RC beams, controls both the failure modes and the stress distribution around the beam chords and enhances the serviceability (deflection produced under working loads be sufficiently small and cracking be controlled) of pre-cracked RC beams with openings. To investigate the possible damage that was caused by the service load and to simulate the structure behavior in the site, a comprehensive experimental study was performed. Two un-strengthened control beams, four beams that were pre-cracked before the application of the AFRP sheets and one beam that was strengthened without pre-cracking were tested. Cracking was first induced, followed by repair using various orientations of AFRP sheets, and then the beams were tested to failure. This load was kept constant during the strengthening process. The results show that both the preexisting damage level and the FRP orientation have a significant effect on strengthening effectiveness and failure mode. All of the strengthened specimens exhibited higher capacities with capacity enhancements ranging from 21.8 to 66.4%, and the crack width reduced by 25.6–82.7% at failure load compared to the control beam. Finally, the authors present a comparison between the experimental results and the predictions using the ACI 440.2R-08 guidelines.