Glycine, leucine, and phenylalanine flux in low-birth-weight infants during parenteral and enteral feeding

Kinetics of three amino acids with different sites and characteristics of metabolic regulation were studied in low-birth-weight infants during enteral and parenteral feeding regimens typical of clinical practice. Primed constant infusions of [15N]glycine, L-[l-13C]leucine, and L-[l-13C]phenylalanine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of clinical nutrition Vol. 55; no. 5; pp. 971 - 975
Main Authors Wykes, LJ, Ball, RO, Menendez, CE, Ginther, DM, Pencharz, PB
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bethesda, MD Elsevier Inc 01.05.1992
American Society for Clinical Nutrition
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Kinetics of three amino acids with different sites and characteristics of metabolic regulation were studied in low-birth-weight infants during enteral and parenteral feeding regimens typical of clinical practice. Primed constant infusions of [15N]glycine, L-[l-13C]leucine, and L-[l-13C]phenylalanine were administered simultaneously by the same route as the feeding, with isotope enrichment measured in urine over 12 h. The effect of feeding regimen was specific to each amino acid (x̄ ± SD): glycine flux was lower during parenteral feeding (470 ± 15 vs 561 ± 69 µmol · kg−1 · h−1, P < 0.05), leucine flux was unaffected (360 ± 77 vs 388 ± 78 µmol · kg−1 · h−1), and phenylalanine flux was higher (106 ± 29 vs 56 ± 6 µmol · kg−1 · h−1, P < 0.01). Kinetics were influenced by the interaction of several factors, including amino acid intake and routes of feeding and tracer administration. Glycine was most affected by route of feeding and phenylalanine was most affected by intake whereas leucine was little affected. Estimates of whole-body protein turnover calculated from leucine and phenylalanine were different; thus calculations of protein turnover from kinetics of a single amino acid should be interpreted with caution.
Bibliography:S20
S30
9193355
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9165
1938-3207
DOI:10.1093/ajcn/55.5.971