Predictive role of evoked potential examinations in patients with clinically isolated optic neuritis in light of the revised McDonald criteria

To analyse the sensitivity and role of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials (EP) in patients with a first episode of clinically isolated optic neuritis (ON) in predicting the development and course of multiple sclerosis (MS), 27 patients with ON underwent EP and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMultiple sclerosis Vol. 14; no. 4; pp. 472 - 478
Main Authors Simó, Magdolna, Barsi, Péter, Arányi, Zsuzsanna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.05.2008
Arnold
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To analyse the sensitivity and role of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials (EP) in patients with a first episode of clinically isolated optic neuritis (ON) in predicting the development and course of multiple sclerosis (MS), 27 patients with ON underwent EP and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations at presentation. Follow-up MRI scans were also performed (mean: 20, range: 4—48 months). It was found that 2/27 patients did not fulfill the MRI (McDonald) and clinical criteria of MS upon follow-up and also had normal EP results. Abnormal EP results were found in 6/27 patients and all of them had follow-up MRI results fulfilling the revised McDonald criteria of MS; 4/6 patients in this group were also diagnosed as clinically definitive MS. The majority, 19/27 patients had normal EP results, but went on to develop MS based on follow-up MRI results and McDonald criteria. Of these patients, however, only 3/19 converted to clinically definitive MS as well. The baseline MRI was abnormal in similar proportions (4/6 and 12/19) in these last two groups of patients. Thus, abnormal EP examinations at the first episode of ON can be considered as a predictive factor only for the earlier clinical conversion to MS — in this respect, however, being more sensitive than the initial MRI — and as such they may contribute to the delineation of the patient group who may benefit from early immunomodulatory treatment. They do not however have a predictive value for the development of MS itself as diagnosed by the McDonald criteria. Multiple Sclerosis 2008; 14: 472—478. http://msj.sagepub.com
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1352-4585
1477-0970
DOI:10.1177/1352458507085061