Environmental context influences visually perceived distance

• Published in: Perception & psychophysics Vol. 68; no. 4; pp. 571 - 581
• Main Authors: LAPPIN, Joseph S, SHELTON, Amy L, RIESER, John J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Austin, TX Psychonomic Society 01.05.2006
• Subjects: Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Cues; Discrimination (Psychology); Distance Perception; Environment; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Male; Perception; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Reaction Time; Vision; Visual Perception; Context; Human; Vision; Cognition; Space perception; Experimental study; Distance
• ISSN: 0031-5117; 1532-5962
• DOI: 10.3758/BF03208759

What properties determine visually perceived space? We discovered that the perceived relative distances of familiar objects in natural settings depended in unexpected ways onthe surrounding visual field. Observers bisected egocentric distances in a lobby, in a hallway, and on an open lawn. Three key findings were the following: (1) Perceived midpoints were too far from the observer, which is the opposite of the common foreshortening effect. (2) This antiforeshortening constant error depended on the environmental setting--greatest in the lobby and hall but nonsignificant on the lawn. (3) Context also affected distance discrimination; variability was greater in the hall than in the lobby or on the lawn. A second experiment replicated these findings, using a method of constant stimuli. Evidently, both the accuracy and the precision of perceived distance depend on subtle properties of the surrounding environment.