Biocompatibility and degradation of poly(ether–ester) microspheres: in vitro and in vivo evaluation

Microspheres of a hydrophobic and a hydrophilic poly(ether–ester) copolymer were evaluated for their in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility and degradation. The microspheres prior to and after sterilization were tested for in vitro cytotoxicity. The in vivo biocompatibility of the poly(ethylene glyco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiomaterials Vol. 23; no. 24; pp. 4719 - 4729
Main Authors van Dijkhuizen-Radersma, R, Hesseling, S.C, Kaim, P.E, de Groot, K, Bezemer, J.M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2002
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Microspheres of a hydrophobic and a hydrophilic poly(ether–ester) copolymer were evaluated for their in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility and degradation. The microspheres prior to and after sterilization were tested for in vitro cytotoxicity. The in vivo biocompatibility of the poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PEGT/PBT) microspheres was evaluated subcutaneously and intramuscularly for 24 weeks in rabbits. The in vivo degradation of the microspheres was studied microscopically and compared to the in vitro degradation. The in vitro and in vivo studies showed the biocompatibility of the microspheres of both the hydrophobic and the hydrophilic PEGT/PBT copolymer. Extracts of these microspheres showed no cytotoxic reactivity in the in vitro cytotoxicity test. Sterilization of the microspheres by gamma irradiation did not affect the cytotoxicity. PEGT/PBT microspheres injected subcutaneously and intramuscularly in rabbits showed a mild tissue response in vivo, in terms of the inflammatory response, the foreign body reaction and the granulation tissue response. Although an in vitro degradation experiment showed a decrease in molecular weight due to hydrolysis, the in vivo degradation of the microspheres was slower than previously published.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0142-9612
1878-5905
DOI:10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00220-X