Antibody against poly(ethylene glycol) adversely affects PEG‐asparaginase therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients

BACKGROUND. Rapid clearance of poly(ethylene glycol)‐asparaginase (PEG‐ASNase) has been reported for up to one‐third of patients treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), potentially rendering their treatment ineffective. A 25% occurrence of an antibody against PEG (anti‐PEG) was previously re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer Vol. 110; no. 1; pp. 103 - 111
Main Authors Armstrong, Jonathan K., Hempel, Georg, Koling, Susanne, Chan, Linda S., Fisher, Timothy, Meiselman, Herbert J., Garratty, George
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.07.2007
Wiley-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND. Rapid clearance of poly(ethylene glycol)‐asparaginase (PEG‐ASNase) has been reported for up to one‐third of patients treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), potentially rendering their treatment ineffective. A 25% occurrence of an antibody against PEG (anti‐PEG) was previously reported in healthy blood donors. The objective of the study was to determine whether anti‐PEG was associated with rapid clearance PEG‐ASNase. METHODS. The investigation reanalyzed stored sera from pediatric patients enrolled in the ALL Berlin‐Frankfurt‐Muenster 2000 studies. Twenty‐eight samples were selected to include 15 subjects with undetectable ASNase activity after receiving PEG‐ASNase. Sixteen subjects treated with unmodified ASNase were also included, 8 with low ASNase activity. Sera were tested for anti‐PEG using 2 techniques: 1) serology, by agglutination of PEG‐coated red blood cells; 2) flow cytometry, by analysis of 10 μm PEG beads stained for bound immunoglobulins. RESULTS. Of the 15 sera from PEG‐ASNase‐treated patients with undetectable ASNase activity, anti‐PEG was detected in 9 by serology and in 12 by flow cytometry. Anti‐PEG was detected in 1 PEG‐ASNase‐treated patient with lower ASNase activity (123 U/L). No relation was observed between anti‐PEG and serum ASNase activity for patients treated with unmodified ASNase. CONCLUSIONS. The presence of anti‐PEG was very closely associated with rapid clearance of PEG‐ASNase. Further comprehensive studies are warranted to fully elucidate the effect of anti‐PEG on PEG‐conjugated agents. Screening and monitoring for anti‐PEG may allow identification of patients for whom a modified dosing strategy or use of a non‐PEGylated drug would be appropriate. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society. Rapid clearance of poly(ethylene glycol)‐asparaginase (PEG‐ASNase) has been reported for up to one‐third of patients treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The presence of antibody specific to poly(ethylene glycol) was very closely associated with undetectable serum ASNase activity in PEG‐ASNase‐treated patients.
Bibliography:Fax: (323) 442‐1617
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.22739