Wide‐complex Tachycardia: Continued Evaluation of Diagnostic Criteria

• Published in: Academic emergency medicine Vol. 7; no. 7; pp. 769 - 773
• Main Authors: Isenhour, Jennifer L, Craig, Sandra, Gibbs, Michael, Littmann, Laszlo, Rose, Geoffrey, Risch, Robert
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2000
• Subjects: aberrancy; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brugada; Cardiology - methods; Clinical Competence; Confidence Intervals; criteria; Electrocardiography; Emergency Medicine - methods; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; North Carolina; Observer Variation; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; supraventricular tachycardia with aberra; Tachycardia, Supraventricular - diagnosis; Tachycardia, Ventricular - diagnosis; ventricular tachycardia; wide‐complex tachycardia; North Carolina
• ISSN: 1069-6563; 1553-2712
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02267.x

. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of the Brugada algorithm for analysis of wide‐complex tachycardia (WCT) when applied by board‐certified emergency physicians and board‐certified cardiologists. Methods: A database consisting of 157 electrocardiograms of WCTs were evaluated in a blinded fashion using the Brugada criteria to determine the presence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or supraventricular tachycardia with aberrancy. These results were then compared with the electrophysiologically proven diagnosis for each tracing. Sensitivity and specificity of the Brugada criteria for diagnosis of VT were calculated. Two board‐certified emergency physicians and two board‐certified cardiologists analyzed each tracing, and interobserver agreement was determined using the kappa statistic. Results: Sensitivity and specificity for the determination of VT using the Brugada algorithm were 85% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 79% to 91%] and 60% (95% CI = 43% to 78%) for cardiologist 1 (C 1) and 91% (95% CI = 86% to 96%) and 55% (95% CI = 37% to 72%) for C 2. Emergency physician (EP 1) achieved a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI = 78% to 91%) and a specificity of 43% (95% CI = 25% to 59%), while EP 2 attained 79% (95% CI = 73% to 87%) and 70% (95% CI = 51% to 84%), respectively. The original authors achieved a sensitivity of 98.7% and specificity of 96.5% when determining VT in their study population. Interobserver agreement for the emergency physicians and the cardiologists in determining VT was 82% and 81%, respectively. Conclusions: Neither the emergency physicians nor the cardiologists were able to achieve a sensitivity or specificity as high as that reported by the original investigators when using the Brugada algorithm to determine the presence of VT.