Rethinking the starch digestion hypothesis for AMY1 copy number variation in humans
Alpha‐amylase exists across taxonomic kingdoms with a deep evolutionary history of gene duplications that resulted in several α‐amylase paralogs. Copy number variation (CNV) in the salivary α‐amylase gene (AMY1) exists in many taxa, but among primates, humans appear to have higher average AMY1 copie...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of physical anthropology Vol. 163; no. 4; pp. 645 - 657 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.08.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Alpha‐amylase exists across taxonomic kingdoms with a deep evolutionary history of gene duplications that resulted in several α‐amylase paralogs. Copy number variation (CNV) in the salivary α‐amylase gene (AMY1) exists in many taxa, but among primates, humans appear to have higher average AMY1 copies than nonhuman primates. Additionally, AMY1 CNV in humans has been associated with starch content of diets, and one known function of α‐amylase is its involvement in starch digestion. Thus high AMY1 CNV is considered to result from selection favoring more efficient starch digestion in the Homo lineage. Here, we present several lines of evidence that challenge the hypothesis that increased AMY1 CNV is an adaptation to starch consumption. We observe that α‐ amylase plays a very limited role in starch digestion, with additional steps required for starch digestion and glucose metabolism. Specifically, we note that α‐amylase hydrolysis only produces a minute amount of free glucose with further enzymatic digestion and glucose absorption being rate‐limiting steps for glucose availability. Indeed α‐amylase is nonessential for starch digestion since sucrase‐isomaltase and maltase‐glucoamylase can hydrolyze whole starch granules while releasing glucose. While higher AMY1 CN and CNV among human populations may result from natural selection, existing evidence does not support starch digestion as the major selective force. We report that in humans α‐amylase is expressed in several other tissues where it may have potential roles of evolutionary significance. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Other Sources-1 content type line 63 ObjectType-Editorial-2 ObjectType-Commentary-1 ObjectType-Article-3 |
ISSN: | 0002-9483 1096-8644 2692-7691 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ajpa.23237 |