Ionic effects on viral DNA packaging and portal motor function in bacteriophage φ29

• Published in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 104; no. 27; pp. 11245 - 11250
• Main Authors: Fuller, Derek N, Rickgauer, John Peter, Jardine, Paul J, Grimes, Shelley, Anderson, Dwight L, Smith, Douglas E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: National Academy of Sciences 03.07.2007; National Acad Sciences
• Series: From the Cover
• Subjects: Bacteriophages; Biological Sciences; Capsid; DNA; Electrostatics; Genetic screening; Genomes; Modeling; Motor ability; Packaging; Tweezers
• ISSN: 0027-8424; 1091-6490
• DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701323104

In many viruses, DNA is confined at such high density that its bending rigidity and electrostatic self-repulsion present a strong energy barrier in viral assembly. Therefore, a powerful molecular motor is needed to package the DNA into the viral capsid. Here, we investigate the role of electrostatic repulsion on single DNA packaging dynamics in bacteriophage φ29 via optical tweezers measurements. We show that ionic screening strongly affects the packing forces, confirming the importance of electrostatic repulsion. Separately, we find that ions affect the motor function. We separate these effects through constant force measurements and velocity versus load measurements at both low and high capsid filling. Regarding motor function, we find that eliminating free Mg²⁺ blocks initiation of packaging. In contrast, Na⁺ is not required, but it increases the motor velocity by up to 50% at low load. Regarding internal resistance, we find that the internal force was lowest when Mg²⁺ was the dominant ion or with the addition of 1 mM Co³⁺. Forces resisting DNA confinement were up to [almost equal to]80% higher with Na⁺ as the dominant counterion, and only [almost equal to]90% of the genome length could be packaged in this condition. The observed trend of the packing forces is in accord with that predicted by DNA charge-screening theory. However, the forces are up to six times higher than predicted by models that assume coaxial spooling of the DNA and interaction potentials derived from DNA condensation experiments. The forces are also severalfold higher than ejection forces measured with bacteriophage λ.