Malpractice Claims on Emergency Physicians: Time and Money
Abstract Background: Emergency medicine, with its limited time for patient encounters, unpredictable flow, and lack of a continuing patient-physician relationship, is a particularly high-risk field with regards to the issue of medical liability. There have been limited studies on the financial and t...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of emergency medicine Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 22 - 27 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
2012
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Background: Emergency medicine, with its limited time for patient encounters, unpredictable flow, and lack of a continuing patient-physician relationship, is a particularly high-risk field with regards to the issue of medical liability. There have been limited studies on the financial and time exposure emergency physicians face when confronted with a liability suit. Objectives: Provide practicing physicians with guidance as to what can be expected if they are confronted with a medical malpractice claim, and contribute to the literature as the issue of tort reform is debated. Methods: Retrospective study of all closed malpractice claims involving emergency physicians insured by the Illinois State Medical Inter-insurance Exchange covering the 10-year period 1995 to 2004. Results: Of 450 claims, there were 200 cases served. The median incident-to-close time was 45.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 30.6–69.9). The median expense per claim served was $14,091 (IQR $3448–$44,363); 19.5% of cases resulted in an indemnity with a median of $220,000 (IQR $117,500–$700,000). Cases in which an indemnity was eventually made tended to be filed 7.7 months faster ( p = 0.065) and took 14.1 months longer to close ( p < 0.05). In cases with a payout of ≥ $1,000,000, 80% were in the ≤ 1-year age group. Conclusion: In this study, emergency physicians with malpractice suits can expect resolution of the case to take over 45 months after an alleged incident, and their malpractice insurer will incur over $14,000 in expenses regardless of the suit outcome. Cases involving patients aged ≤ 1 year may incur higher indemnity payments. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0736-4679 2352-5029 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.06.014 |