Comparison of a type curve and a least-squared errors method to estimate biofilm kinetic parameters

Because of the kinetics of diffusion limitation and the difficulty of replicating biofilm structure in a test vessel, biokinetic parameters of substrate consumption (maximum specific substrate removal rate, q m and half-maximum removal coefficient, K s) are particularly difficult to measure in biofi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWater research (Oxford) Vol. 37; no. 13; pp. 3279 - 3285
Main Authors Riefler, R.Guy, Smets, Barth F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2003
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Because of the kinetics of diffusion limitation and the difficulty of replicating biofilm structure in a test vessel, biokinetic parameters of substrate consumption (maximum specific substrate removal rate, q m and half-maximum removal coefficient, K s) are particularly difficult to measure in biofilm reactors. In this research, a type curve method using load-shift experiments was compared to a method using a least-squared errors (LSE) routine. More accurate and precise estimates were obtained with the LSE routine than with the type curve method by removing subjectivity from the estimation process. In addition, the LSE estimation process allowed a more rigorous evaluation of the adequacy of the data fit, permitted estimation of approximate confidence intervals of parameters, and identified flaws in the data set. As a result, we advocate the use of the recently developed LSE based estimation routine to estimate parameters from such experiments.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0043-1354
1879-2448
DOI:10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00139-8