GAIN2 trial overall survival with intense versus tailored dose dense chemotherapy in early breast cancer

GAIN-2 trial evaluated the optimal intense dose-dense (idd) strategy for high-risk early breast cancer. This study reports the secondary endpoints pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS). Patients ( n  = 2887) were randomized 1:1 between idd epirubicin, nab-paclitaxel, and cyc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNPJ breast cancer Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 66 - 10
Main Authors Möbus, Volker, Lück, Hans-Joachim, Ladda, Ekkehart, Klare, Peter, Engels, Knut, Schmidt, Marcus, Schneeweiss, Andreas, Grischke, Eva-Maria, Wachsmann, Grischa, Forstbauer, Helmut, Untch, Michael, Marmé, Frederik, Blohmer, Jens-Uwe, Jackisch, Christian, Huober, Jens, Stickeler, Elmar, Reinisch, Mattea, Link, Theresa, Sinn, Bruno, Janni, Wolfgang, Denkert, Carsten, Seiler, Sabine, Solbach, Christine, Schmatloch, Sabine, Rey, Julia, Loibl, Sibylle
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 30.07.2024
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:GAIN-2 trial evaluated the optimal intense dose-dense (idd) strategy for high-risk early breast cancer. This study reports the secondary endpoints pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS). Patients ( n  = 2887) were randomized 1:1 between idd epirubicin, nab-paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (iddEnPC) versus leukocyte nadir-based tailored regimen of dose-dense EC and docetaxel (dtEC-dtD) as adjuvant therapy, with neoadjuvant therapy allowed after amendment. At median follow-up of 6.5 years (overall cohort) and 5.7 years (neoadjuvant cohort, N  = 593), both regimens showed comparable 5-year OS rates (iddEnPC 90.8%, dtEC-dtD 90.0%, p  = 0.320). In the neoadjuvant setting, iddEnPC yielded a higher pCR rate than dtEC-dtD (51.2% vs. 42.6%, p  = 0.045). Patients achieving pCR had significantly improved 5-year iDFS (88.7% vs. 70.1%, HR 0.33, p  < 0.001) and OS rates (93.9% vs. 83.1%, HR 0.32, p  < 0.001), but OS outcomes were comparable regardless of pCR status. Thus, iddEnPC demonstrates superior pCR rates compared to dtEC-dtD, yet with comparable survival outcomes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2374-4677
2374-4677
DOI:10.1038/s41523-024-00675-x