Salvage liver transplantation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A Meta-analysis
AIM: To evaluate survival and recurrence after salvage liver transplantation (SLT) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with primary liver transplantation (PLT) using a meta-analysis. METHODS: Literature on SLT versus PLT for the treatment of HCC published between 1966 and Ju...
Saved in:
Published in | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 18; no. 19; pp. 2415 - 2422 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited
21.05.2012
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | AIM: To evaluate survival and recurrence after salvage liver transplantation (SLT) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with primary liver transplantation (PLT) using a meta-analysis.
METHODS: Literature on SLT versus PLT for the treatment of HCC published between 1966 and July 2011 was retrieved. A metaanalysis was conducted to esti- mate pooled survival and disease-free rates. A fixed or random-effect model was established to collect the data.
RESULTS: The differences in overall survival and disease-free survival rates at 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were not statistically significant between SLT group and PLT group (P 〉 0.05). After stratifying the various studies by donor source and Milan criteria, we found that: (1) Living donor liver transplantation recipients had significantly higher 1-year survival rate, lower 3-year and 5-year survival rates compared with deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients. And in DDLT recipients they had better 1-year and 5-year disease-free survival rate in SLT group; and (2) No difference was seen in 1-year, 3-year and 5-yearsurvival rates between two groups who beyond Milan criteria at the time of liver transplantation.
CONCLUSION: SLT can be effectively performed for patients with recurrence or deterioration of liver function after hepatectomy for HCC. It does not increase the perioperative mortality and has a similar long-term survival rates compared to PLT. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 14-1219/R AIM: To evaluate survival and recurrence after salvage liver transplantation (SLT) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with primary liver transplantation (PLT) using a meta-analysis. METHODS: Literature on SLT versus PLT for the treatment of HCC published between 1966 and July 2011 was retrieved. A metaanalysis was conducted to esti- mate pooled survival and disease-free rates. A fixed or random-effect model was established to collect the data. RESULTS: The differences in overall survival and disease-free survival rates at 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were not statistically significant between SLT group and PLT group (P 〉 0.05). After stratifying the various studies by donor source and Milan criteria, we found that: (1) Living donor liver transplantation recipients had significantly higher 1-year survival rate, lower 3-year and 5-year survival rates compared with deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients. And in DDLT recipients they had better 1-year and 5-year disease-free survival rate in SLT group; and (2) No difference was seen in 1-year, 3-year and 5-yearsurvival rates between two groups who beyond Milan criteria at the time of liver transplantation. CONCLUSION: SLT can be effectively performed for patients with recurrence or deterioration of liver function after hepatectomy for HCC. It does not increase the perioperative mortality and has a similar long-term survival rates compared to PLT. Salvage liver transplantation; Primary livertransplantation; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Meta-analy-sis; Survival rate ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 Correspondence to: Bo Li, PhD, MD, Department of Liver and Vascular Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China. doclibo@126.com Author contributions: Li HY designed the research, collected data and wrote the manuscript; Wei YG and Li B designed the research and contributed to the discussion; Yan LN contributed to the discussion. Telephone: +86-28-85422476 Fax: +86-28-85423724 |
ISSN: | 1007-9327 2219-2840 |
DOI: | 10.3748/wjg.v18.i19.2415 |