A Spherical Phase Space Partitioning Based Symbolic Time Series Analysis (SPSP—STSA) for Emotion Recognition Using EEG Signals

Emotion recognition systems have been of interest to researchers for a long time. Improvement of brain-computer interface systems currently makes EEG-based emotion recognition more attractive. These systems try to develop strategies that are capable of recognizing emotions automatically. There are m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in human neuroscience Vol. 16; p. 936393
Main Authors Tavakkoli, Hoda, Motie Nasrabadi, Ali
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lausanne Frontiers Research Foundation 29.06.2022
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Emotion recognition systems have been of interest to researchers for a long time. Improvement of brain-computer interface systems currently makes EEG-based emotion recognition more attractive. These systems try to develop strategies that are capable of recognizing emotions automatically. There are many approaches due to different features extractions methods for analyzing the EEG signals. Still, Since the brain is supposed to be a nonlinear dynamic system, it seems a nonlinear dynamic analysis tool may yield more convenient results. A novel approach in Symbolic Time Series Analysis (STSA) for signal phase space partitioning and symbol sequence generating is introduced in this study. Symbolic sequences have been produced by means of spherical partitioning of phase space; then, they have been compared and classified based on the maximum value of a similarity index. Obtaining the automatic independent emotion recognition EEG-based system has always been discussed because of the subject-dependent content of emotion. Here we introduce a subject-independent protocol to solve the generalization problem. To prove our method’s effectiveness, we used the DEAP dataset, and we reached an accuracy of 98.44% for classifying happiness from sadness (two- emotion groups). It was 93.75% for three (happiness, sadness, and joy), 89.06% for four (happiness, sadness, joy, and terrible), and 85% for five emotional groups (happiness, sadness, joy, terrible and mellow). According to these results, it is evident that our subject-independent method is more accurate rather than many other methods in different studies. In addition, a subject-independent method has been proposed in this study, which is not considered in most of the studies in this field.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Masoud Seraji, University of Texas at Austin, United States; Ali Rahimpour Jounghani, University of California, Merced, United States; Mohammad Shams, George Mason University, United States
Edited by: Lutz Jäncke, University of Zurich, Switzerland
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Cognitive Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
ISSN:1662-5161
1662-5161
DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2022.936393