Cardiac transplantation in patients over 50 years of age

Sixty-two patients underwent cardiac transplantation at the University of Arizona from March 1979 to March 1985. Thirteen patients (11 men and 2 women) were over 50 years of age at the time of transplantation and 49 were under the age of 50. The mean age (± SEM) of the patients over 50 was 53 ± 1 ye...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 285 - 288
Main Authors Carrier, Michel, Emery, Robert W., Riley, Judith E., Levinson, Mark M., Copeland, Jack G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.08.1986
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Sixty-two patients underwent cardiac transplantation at the University of Arizona from March 1979 to March 1985. Thirteen patients (11 men and 2 women) were over 50 years of age at the time of transplantation and 49 were under the age of 50. The mean age (± SEM) of the patients over 50 was 53 ± 1 years. Eight of these patients were treated with conventional immunosuppressive therapy (azathioprine, prednisone and rabbit antithymocyte globulin) and Ave, beginning in January 1983, were treated with cyclosporine, prednisone and rabbit antithymocyte globulin. Early mortality (0 to 90 days) was 16% in the group over 50 versus 18% for those under 50. The late mortality (> 90 days) was 36 and 33%, respectively. In both groups, rejection and infection were the principal causes of death. The incidence of infection was 1.9 ± 0.5 episodes per patient in those patients over 50 and 1.9 ± 0.4 in those under 50. The incidence of rejection was 1.3 episodes per patient-year in patients over 50 and 1.7 episodes per patient-year in those under 50. Actuarial survival at 1 year was 72 ± 14% in the group over 50 and 66 ± 7% in the group under 50 years of age. These data indicate that the results of cardiac transplantation for patients over 50 do not differ significantly from those for patients under 50. Therefore, it is concluded that a rigidly defined age criterion for cardiac transplant recipients is not acceptable. Each potential recipient must be evaluated in terms of individual risk and benefit from the procedure.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(86)80041-9