Exact likelihood ratio tests for penalised splines

Penalised-spline-based additive models allow a simple mixed model representation where the variance components control departures from linear models. The smoothing parameter is the ratio of the random-coefficient and error variances and tests for linear regression reduce to tests for zero random-coe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiometrika Vol. 92; no. 1; pp. 91 - 103
Main Authors Claeskens, Gerda, Ruppert, David, Wand, M. P, Crainiceanu, Ciprian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford University Press for Biometrika Trust 01.03.2005
SeriesBiometrika
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Penalised-spline-based additive models allow a simple mixed model representation where the variance components control departures from linear models. The smoothing parameter is the ratio of the random-coefficient and error variances and tests for linear regression reduce to tests for zero random-coefficient variances. We propose exactlikelihood and restricted likelihood ratio tests for testing polynomial regression versus a general alternative modelled by penalised splines. Their spectral decompositions are used as the basis of fast simulation algorithms. We derive the asymptotic local power properties of the tests under weak conditions. In particular we characterise the local alternatives that are detected with asymptotic probability one. Confidence intervals for the smoothing parameter are obtained by inverting the tests for a fixed smoothing parameter versus a general alternative. We discuss F and R tests and show that ignoring the variability in the smoothing parameter estimator can have a dramatic effect on their null distributions. The powers of several known tests are investigated and a small set of tests with good power properties is identified. The restricted likelihood ratio test is among the best in terms of power. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.
ISSN:0006-3444
1464-3510
DOI:10.1093/biomet/92.1.91