Back-up antibiotic prescriptions could reduce unnecessary antibiotic use in rhinosinusitis

To examine the attitudes of patients with rhinosinusitis toward the availability of “back-up” antibiotics, and potential implications for antibiotic use rates. A survey that assessed actual and hypothetical antibiotic prescription patterns was administered to a convenience sample of patients treated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical epidemiology Vol. 57; no. 4; pp. 429 - 434
Main Authors Martin, Corey L, Njike, Valentine Yanchou, Katz, David L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.04.2004
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To examine the attitudes of patients with rhinosinusitis toward the availability of “back-up” antibiotics, and potential implications for antibiotic use rates. A survey that assessed actual and hypothetical antibiotic prescription patterns was administered to a convenience sample of patients treated for rhinosinusitis in one acute care facility between September 1 and December 1, 2001. Of 386 eligible patients, 114 completed the survey. Seventy-six percent of patients expected antibiotic treatment; satisfaction rates were significantly associated with receiving an antibiotic prescription ( P < .05). Over two-thirds of patients (69.7%) reported preference for back-up antibiotic prescriptions in the future, with 91.1% stating they would wait at least 1 day, and 52.7% at least 7 days, to fill a backup prescription. In sensitivity analysis, back-up prescriptions significantly reduced antibiotic use over a wide range of assumptions. The majority of patients with rhinosinusitis in this study expected antibiotic prescriptions, and were more satisfied if they were received. Back-up antibiotics have the potential to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, mitigate risk of nontreatment, and preserve high levels of patient satisfaction.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.008