The Complex Relationship Between Peacebuilding and Terrorism Approaches: Towards Post-Terrorism and a Post-Liberal Peace?

• Published in: Terrorism and political violence Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 120 - 143
• Main Authors: Richmond, Oliver P., Tellidis, Ioannis
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Abingdon Taylor & Francis Group 01.01.2012; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Conceptualization; Conflict; Conflict resolution; Cross-national analysis; Emancipation; hybridity; India; Interaction; Israel; Jammu Kashmir; Kashmir; Liberalism; Nepal; Northern Ireland; Palestine; Palestinian Authority; Peace; Peace building; Peace negotiations; peacebuilding; post-liberal; Production; Reconciliation; Sri Lanka; Terrorism; United Kingdom; Middle East; United Kingdom > UK; Northern Ireland; Sri Lanka; Kashmir; Nepal
• ISSN: 0954-6553; 1556-1836
• DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2011.628720

Approaches to terrorism and peacebuilding have a complex relationship with each other, which may be explained according to four categories outlined in this article. These range from blocking each others' aims, nullifying terrorism, supporting a very limited, or a broader peace process. Each of these categories has implications for the inclusion and reconciliation of a wide range of actors and the hybrid nature of the emerging peace. This relates to the critical approach of using theory to create emancipatory forms of peace, which is used as a basis for the examination of the production of hybridity via the interaction of approaches to terrorism and peacebuilding in five cases in this article. These include Sri Lanka, Kashmir, the Middle East, Nepal, and Northern Ireland. We argue that "post-liberal" possibilities for a hybrid form of peace (which are inherent in such conflicts) offer a "post-terrorist" potential for peace processes.