Comparative evaluation of two olive fruit fly parasitoids under varying abiotic conditions
Psyttalia lounsburyi (Silvestri) and P. humilis (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) were evaluated in California for their potential to control the invasive olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Psyttalia lounsburyi is a specialist on B. oleae while P. humilis also atta...
Saved in:
Published in | BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands) Vol. 56; no. 3; pp. 283 - 293 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Dordrecht
Springer Netherlands
01.06.2011
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Psyttalia lounsburyi
(Silvestri) and
P. humilis
(Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) were evaluated in California for their potential to control the invasive olive fruit fly,
Bactrocera oleae
(Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae).
Psyttalia lounsburyi
is a specialist on
B. oleae
while
P. humilis
also attacks other tephritid species. Field cage trials, conducted from 2006 to 2009, were used to compare
P. lounsburyi
and two populations of
P. humilis
(Kenya and Namibia) in California’s interior valley and coastal regions. Both parasitoid species reproduced on
B. oleae
in all trials. Under similar abiotic conditions, offspring production per female was higher in
P. humilis
than in
P. lounsburyi
, suggesting that host specificity by
P. lounsburyi
does not confer a higher efficiency on
B. oleae
in cultivated olives. Two abiotic factors were shown to impact parasitoid efficiency. First, adult parasitoid survival was poor during periods of high summer temperatures, common to the olive production areas in California’s interior valleys. Second, parasitism levels were lower on
B. oleae
larvae feeding in larger Ascolano
cv.
fruit than in smaller Manzanillo
cv.
fruit. Results are discussed relative to biological control of
B. oleae
in commercial olives and the usefulness of natural enemies specialized to attack fruit flies in wild olives compared with the larger cultivated olive fruit. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1386-6141 1573-8248 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10526-010-9332-8 |