Prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 in sarcoma: a meta-analysis

The prognostic role of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in sarcoma remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis so as to investigate the impact of PD-L1 on clinicopathlogical findings and survival outcomes in sarcoma. A comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was cond...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOncotarget Vol. 8; no. 35; pp. 59570 - 59580
Main Authors Zhu, Zhenhua, Jin, Zheng, Zhang, Mei, Tang, Yajun, Yang, Guang, Yuan, Xiaowei, Yao, Jihang, Sun, Dahui
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Impact Journals LLC 29.08.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The prognostic role of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in sarcoma remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis so as to investigate the impact of PD-L1 on clinicopathlogical findings and survival outcomes in sarcoma. A comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was conducted for relevant studies. The odds ratios or hazard ratios, at 95% confidence intervals were used as measures for investigation of the correlation between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathlogical features or survival outcomes. Fourteen eligible studies comprising 868 patients were selected for analysis. Pooled hazard ratios indicated that the association of PD-L1 expression with overall survival in bone sarcoma (osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma) patients was statistically significant (1.987, 95% CI: 1.224-3.224, = 0.005), as was its association with event-free survival in bone and soft-tissue sarcoma patients (3.868, 95% CI: 2.298-6.511, = 0.000). Additionally, the expression of PD-L1 was positively correlated with the infiltration of programmed death 1 (PD-1) positive T-lymphocytes (OR: 4.012, 95% CI: 2.391-6.733, = 0.000). Our meta-analysis indicated that high PD-L1 expression is likely to be a negative factor for patients with sarcomas and that it predicts worse survival outcomes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1949-2553
1949-2553
DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.19168