Comparison of image quality in contrast-enhanced coronary-artery visualization by electron beam tomography and retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral computed tomography

• Published in: Investigative radiology Vol. 38; no. 2; p. 119
• Main Authors: Achenbach, Stephan, Giesler, Tom, Ropers, Dieter, Ulzheimer, Stefan, Anders, Katharina, Wenkel, Evelyn, Pohle, Karsten, Kachelriess, Marc, Derlien, Hans, Kalender, Willi A, Daniel, Werner G, Bautz, Werner, Baum, Ulrich
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.02.2003
• Subjects: Aged; Contrast Media - administration & dosage; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Tomography, Spiral Computed; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
• ISSN: 0020-9996
• DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200302000-00007

To compare the image quality of electron beam tomography (EBT) and multislice spiral CT (MSCT) for coronary artery visualization. Two groups of 30 patients without coronary stenoses were studied by MSCT (4 x 1 mm collimation) or EBT (3 mm slice thickness). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), overall length of the visualized arteries and vessel length free of motion artifacts were measured. Length of visualized arteries was equal in MSCT and EBT. In EBT, longer segments were depicted free of motion artifacts (MSCT: 73%, EBT: 92% of visualized length, P< 0.001) and CNR was significantly higher than in MSCT (15.4 vs. 9.0; P< 0.001). In both modalities, vessel diameters correlated closely to quantitative coronary angiography. EBT and MSCT permit reliable coronary artery visualization and measurement of vessel diameters. For the used scan protocol, MSCT images had a lower CNR and were more frequently affected by motion.