Histologic and Outcome Study Supports Reclassifying Appendiceal Goblet Cell Carcinoids as Goblet Cell Adenocarcinomas, and Grading and Staging Similarly to Colonic Adenocarcinomas

Goblet cell carcinoid tumors are amphicrine tumors whose biological behavior ranges from indolent to highly aggressive, depending on tumor grade. Current grading systems for these tumors are based on identifying an adenocarcinoma arising in the setting of a goblet cell carcinoid tumor, which disting...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgical pathology Vol. 42; no. 7; p. 898
Main Authors Yozu, Masato, Johncilla, Melanie E, Srivastava, Amitabh, Ryan, David P, Cusack, James C, Doyle, Leona, Setia, Namrata, Yang, Michelle, Lauwers, Gregory Y, Odze, Robert D, Misdraji, Joseph
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Goblet cell carcinoid tumors are amphicrine tumors whose biological behavior ranges from indolent to highly aggressive, depending on tumor grade. Current grading systems for these tumors are based on identifying an adenocarcinoma arising in the setting of a goblet cell carcinoid tumor, which distinguishes this tumor from other gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinomas. Because goblet cell tumors are predominantly tumors of mucin secreting cells, we propose that they be classified as goblet cell adenocarcinomas, and graded using a methodology that has parallels in colorectal adenocarcinoma grading. We graded a large series of goblet cell adenocarcinomas by assessing the proportion of the tumor that demonstrates tubular or clustered growth. Histologic grade correlated with overall survival independent of stage, with median overall survival of 204, 86, and 29 months for low-grade, intermediate-grade, and high-grade goblet cell adenocarcinomas, respectively. Tumor stage also correlated with overall survival. We also graded the tumors according to previously proposed grading systems, and found that these systems are valid, in that they segregate patients according to prognosis.
ISSN:1532-0979
DOI:10.1097/pas.0000000000001056