Citizen Attributions of Blame in Third-Party Governance
The authors use a survey experiment to examine how structural differences in governance arrangements affect citizens' notions of who is culpable for poor service quality. More specifically, two questions are investigated: (1) When things go wrong, do citizens attribute more blame to political a...
Saved in:
Published in | Public administration review Vol. 76; no. 1; pp. 96 - 108 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.01.2016
American Society for Public Administration |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The authors use a survey experiment to examine how structural differences in governance arrangements affect citizens' notions of who is culpable for poor service quality. More specifically, two questions are investigated: (1) When things go wrong, do citizens attribute more blame to political actors if the provider of government services is a public agency or a private contractor? (2) Does the length of the accountability chain linking political actors to service providers influence citizens' attributions of blame? The authors hypothesize that provider sector and accountability chain length affect citizens' perceptions of political actors' control over service delivery, which, in turn, inform citizens' attributions of blame. Mixed support is found for this theory. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:PUAR12474 istex:EF9AA48E17CB321F5BC99133E6AEBDEAF3B50073 ark:/67375/WNG-NMVHT7KL-L Appendix S1: Supplementary Information and Analyses |
ISSN: | 0033-3352 1540-6210 |
DOI: | 10.1111/puar.12474 |