Citizen Attributions of Blame in Third-Party Governance

The authors use a survey experiment to examine how structural differences in governance arrangements affect citizens' notions of who is culpable for poor service quality. More specifically, two questions are investigated: (1) When things go wrong, do citizens attribute more blame to political a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPublic administration review Vol. 76; no. 1; pp. 96 - 108
Main Authors Marvel, John D., Girth, Amanda M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2016
American Society for Public Administration
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The authors use a survey experiment to examine how structural differences in governance arrangements affect citizens' notions of who is culpable for poor service quality. More specifically, two questions are investigated: (1) When things go wrong, do citizens attribute more blame to political actors if the provider of government services is a public agency or a private contractor? (2) Does the length of the accountability chain linking political actors to service providers influence citizens' attributions of blame? The authors hypothesize that provider sector and accountability chain length affect citizens' perceptions of political actors' control over service delivery, which, in turn, inform citizens' attributions of blame. Mixed support is found for this theory.
Bibliography:ArticleID:PUAR12474
istex:EF9AA48E17CB321F5BC99133E6AEBDEAF3B50073
ark:/67375/WNG-NMVHT7KL-L
Appendix S1: Supplementary Information and Analyses
ISSN:0033-3352
1540-6210
DOI:10.1111/puar.12474