Operative Results and Oncologic Outcomes of Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Versus Two-Stage Hepatectomy (TSH) in Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has recently emerged as a treatment choice for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and inadequate future liver remnant (FLR). The aim of this study was to define the results of ALPPS compared w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of surgery Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 806 - 815
Main Authors Moris, Dimitrios, Ronnekleiv-Kelly, Sean, Kostakis, Ioannis D., Tsilimigras, Diamantis I., Beal, Eliza W., Papalampros, Alexandros, Dimitroulis, Dimitrios, Felekouras, Evangelos, Pawlik, Timothy M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.03.2018
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has recently emerged as a treatment choice for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and inadequate future liver remnant (FLR). The aim of this study was to define the results of ALPPS compared with two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) for patients with CLM. Materials and methods A meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Identification of eligible studies was performed using three distinct databases through February 2017; Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane library—Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using a syntax including medical subject headings terms “portal vein ligation,” “PVE,” “staged hepatectomy,” “staged liver resection,” “liver resection,” “two-stage hepatectomy,” “TSH,” “in situ liver transection with portal vein ligation,” “associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy” and “ALPPS”. Results Among the 634 records identified, 9 studies comparing ALPPS with TSH met the inclusion criteria. These studies included 657 patients with unresectable CLM (ALPPS, n  = 186 vs TSH, n  = 471). There was no difference in final postoperative FLR between ALPPS versus TSH (mean difference: 31.72, 95% CI: −27.33 to 90.77, p  = 0.29). The kinetic growth rate was faster with the ALPPS versus TSH (mean difference 19.07 ml/day, 95% CI 8.12–30.02, p  = 0.0006). TSH had a lower overall and major morbidity versus ALPPS (overall morbidity: RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.07–1.8, p  = 0.01; I 2 : 58%, p  = 0.01; major morbidity: RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.18–2.08, p  = 0.002; I 2 : 0%, p  = 0.44). Overall survival was comparable following ALPPS versus TSH. Conclusion While ALPPS may be a suitable approach for patients, the higher morbidity and mortality should be considered when determining the operative approach for patients with extensive CLM.
Bibliography:Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi
contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
10.1007/s00268‐017‐4181‐6
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:0364-2313
1432-2323
1432-2323
DOI:10.1007/s00268-017-4181-6