Operative Results and Oncologic Outcomes of Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Versus Two-Stage Hepatectomy (TSH) in Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has recently emerged as a treatment choice for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and inadequate future liver remnant (FLR). The aim of this study was to define the results of ALPPS compared w...
Saved in:
Published in | World journal of surgery Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 806 - 815 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cham
Springer International Publishing
01.03.2018
John Wiley & Sons, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has recently emerged as a treatment choice for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and inadequate future liver remnant (FLR). The aim of this study was to define the results of ALPPS compared with two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) for patients with CLM.
Materials and methods
A meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Identification of eligible studies was performed using three distinct databases through February 2017; Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane library—Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using a syntax including medical subject headings terms “portal vein ligation,” “PVE,” “staged hepatectomy,” “staged liver resection,” “liver resection,” “two-stage hepatectomy,” “TSH,” “in situ liver transection with portal vein ligation,” “associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy” and “ALPPS”.
Results
Among the 634 records identified, 9 studies comparing ALPPS with TSH met the inclusion criteria. These studies included 657 patients with unresectable CLM (ALPPS,
n
= 186 vs TSH,
n
= 471). There was no difference in final postoperative FLR between ALPPS versus TSH (mean difference: 31.72, 95% CI: −27.33 to 90.77,
p
= 0.29). The kinetic growth rate was faster with the ALPPS versus TSH (mean difference 19.07 ml/day, 95% CI 8.12–30.02,
p
= 0.0006). TSH had a lower overall and major morbidity versus ALPPS (overall morbidity: RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.07–1.8,
p
= 0.01;
I
2
: 58%,
p
= 0.01; major morbidity: RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.18–2.08,
p
= 0.002;
I
2
: 0%,
p
= 0.44). Overall survival was comparable following ALPPS versus TSH.
Conclusion
While ALPPS may be a suitable approach for patients, the higher morbidity and mortality should be considered when determining the operative approach for patients with extensive CLM. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. 10.1007/s00268‐017‐4181‐6 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-4 |
ISSN: | 0364-2313 1432-2323 1432-2323 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00268-017-4181-6 |