Does artificial light at night alter moth community composition?

• Published in: Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences Vol. 378; no. 1892; p. 20220365
• Main Authors: Grenis, Kylee, Nufio, César, Wimp, Gina M., Murphy, Shannon M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 18.12.2023
• ISSN: 0962-8436; 1471-2970
• DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0365

Ecological studies investigating the effects of artificial light at night (ALAN) have primarily focused on single or a few species, and seldom on community-level dynamics. As ALAN is a potential cause of insect and biodiversity declines, community-level perspectives are essential. We empirically tested the hypothesis that moth species differentially respond to ALAN and that these responses can cause shifts in community composition. We sampled moths from prairie fragments in Colorado, USA. We tested whether local light sources, sky glow, site area and/or vegetation affected moth community diversity. We found that increased sky glow decreased moth abundance and species richness and shifted community composition. Increased sky glow shifted moth community composition when light and bait traps were combined; notably this result appears to be driven entirely by moths sampled at bait traps, which is an unbiased sampling technique. Our results show that ALAN has significant effects on moth communities and that local light sources have contrasting effects on moth community composition compared to sky glow. It is imperative that we better understand the contrasting effects of types of ALAN to comprehend the overall impacts of light pollution on biodiversity declines. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Light pollution in complex ecological systems’.