Evolution of measured module characteristics versus labelled module characteristics of crystalline silicon based PV modules

•Comparison of electrical parameters measured of Si PV modules with nameplate values.•Mean divergence from Pmax rated of −3.15% for 992 modules for a period of 32 years.•Number of modules that do not meet the tolerance ranges decreased over the years.•Average Pmax results showed improvement over tim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSolar energy Vol. 160; pp. 252 - 259
Main Authors Lopez-Garcia, Juan, Sample, Tony
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Ltd 15.01.2018
Pergamon Press Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Comparison of electrical parameters measured of Si PV modules with nameplate values.•Mean divergence from Pmax rated of −3.15% for 992 modules for a period of 32 years.•Number of modules that do not meet the tolerance ranges decreased over the years.•Average Pmax results showed improvement over time due to factory solar simulators fitting.•Economic assessment of the differences between measured and labelled is performed. This work outlines the evolution of measured module parameters (power Pmax, short circuit current Isc, open circuit voltage Voc) vs labelled module parameters of crystalline silicon PV modules over a number of decades at the European Solar Test Installation (ESTI) at Ispra, Italy. Manufacturers' tolerance in nameplate power has changed over the years with many claiming ±10% in the 80s and 90s. The declared tolerance over recent years has been reduced to ±5% then ±3% and today values of −0/+3% are quite common. To know the declared tolerance of modules in an operational system is useful additional information when investigating the aging of PV systems, when the original module power may either be unknown or missing with the passage of decades. Therefore, researchers have often to rely on the labelled power for the starting point of the system. Measurements at the ESTI laboratory have been performed since the early 1980s. A comparison of those modules which incorporated either a nameplate (or an associated datasheet, flash report or online information) to their measured output parameters (Pmax, Isc and Voc) has been carried out. The impact of these differences from an economic point of view has been also analysed. This work presents some selected results from a set of 992 crystalline silicon based modules, extracted from various time periods from 1982 to 2014.
ISSN:0038-092X
1471-1257
DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.018